The COVID-19 pandemic has seen market rise to unprecedented highs throughout March and has tested the resilience and strength of our investment process.

It was only three months ago, we released Tribe’s three-year performance highlighting our investment approach and our strong risk-adjusted performance. Our results showed that we had outperformed within our comparable universe (as defined by ARC) by 6.7% during this period. We attribute this to prioritising investment into companies that are being more thoughtful about future-proofing their earnings, and consequently, their own corporate brands.

We believe by consistently and rigorously adhering to our (investment and impact) investment selection approach, we’re able to deliver both financial and non-financial returns to our clients.

Despite the challenging market conditions, our Q1 2020 performance shows continued relative outperformance, which up until now, has been delivered in the comparatively benign environment of a pre-Covid-19 world. Our medium-risk bespoke model performance fell -6.6% in Q1, versus -10.6% for ARC 1 .

Return metrics

Footnotes: 2 3 4

There are three major themes adding to our performance:

  1. Within our Strategic Asset Allocation, we have a relatively high (21%) exposure to “uncorrelated/alternative” investments which we class as those investments which have revenue and earnings models uncorrelated to the liquid and markets. Our investments in and recorded gains in the Q1 2020 period. We believe that our focus on impactful and positive investments helps us in uncovering and researching many of these types of opportunities.
  2. We carry minimal exposure to the travel and tourism industries, as well as the non-staple consumer goods businesses. Our preference is for businesses geared towards solutions addressing and supporting the . In addition, we benefitted from being overweight, relative to the index, in healthcare and utilities names, which have fared considerably better on a relative basis.
  3. We have a near zero exposure to fossil fuel energy stocks. While portfolios such as ours received a relative boost from the failure of the Saudi/Russian oil production discussions mid quarter, we note that oil prices were already suffering from lower demand from China based on the Covid-19 disruption before settling at now half their H2 2019 average levels.

The Covid-19 crisis is a test of our investment thesis. This period of heightened market , and of course human tragedy, is driving an evolution in the assessment of what constitutes appropriate corporate behaviour. Our performance over this period provides the team here at Tribe further conviction that businesses which have already re-focussed their culture to (i) take into account the broad goals of the agenda, and/or (ii) are working towards solutions that are focused on creating greater balance in both society and the environment, are investing in their long-term relevance and hence, ultimate value to all shareholders.


  1. ARC data Q1 Jan 1st to March 31st
    Scroll to footnote
  2. The performance of actual portfolios linked to the medium risk bespoke model may differ once we have taken into consideration a client’s individual portfolio requirements
    Scroll to footnote
  3. Returns are calculated net of Tribe’s management fee and third-party fund costs. Dividends are paid on an accrued basis
    Scroll to footnote
  4. From 31 October 2019 we changed our industry performance benchmark from the ARC Steady Growth to the ARC Balanced benchmark. The ARC Balanced benchmark is more reflective of our long-term Strategic Asset Allocation and is more suitable for portfolios with relative risk to [tooltip]equity[/tooltip] markets of between 40-60%
    Scroll to footnote