Our Chief Impact Officer spoke to the Financial Times about the differences between some companies net zeroNet ZeroReducing absolute greenhouse gas emissions to as close to zero as possible. This is done via reductions in core emissions (through process efficiencies and product adaptation) across a business’s Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 footprint. read more ambitions and others.
Along with the Science Based TargetsScience Based Targets (SBTs)Provide a defined pathway for companies to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, helping prevent the worst impacts of climate change and future-proof business growth. Targets are considered ‘science-based’ if they are in line with what the latest climate science believes is necessary to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement — limiting global warming to below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and pursuing efforts to limit warming to 1.5°C. read more Initiative framework, net zeroNet ZeroReducing absolute greenhouse gas emissions to as close to zero as possible. This is done via reductions in core emissions (through process efficiencies and product adaptation) across a business’s Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 footprint. read more carbon commitments should be compliant with the Oxford Offsetting Principles — a new and more exacting set of guidelines from Oxford university.
This way, clients have comfort that company net zeroNet ZeroReducing absolute greenhouse gas emissions to as close to zero as possible. This is done via reductions in core emissions (through process efficiencies and product adaptation) across a business’s Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 footprint. read more ambitions are not just “a gesture to give a positive impression”.
Read the full article.
